Key Figure from Alabama Involved in Efforts to Influence Votes Against Kamala Harris
An Alabama political figure, Paul Hamrick, plays a crucial role in efforts to influence votes against Kamala Harris by supporting third-party candidates. Discover the strategies behind this political maneuvering.
A former Alabama political figure, Paul Hamrick, has become a central player in efforts to influence votes against Vice President Kamala Harris in the upcoming election. Hamrick, who was once the chief of staff to Alabama's former Governor Don Siegelman, is now involved in a nationwide effort to boost third-party candidates like Cornel West. These candidates are seen as potential spoilers who could draw votes away from Harris, favoring former President Donald Trump.
Last spring, Italo Medelius, a co-chair of West’s “Justice for All Party,” was working to get West on the presidential ballot in North Carolina. Medelius received a call from Hamrick, who offered help. However, this assistance soon complicated Medelius's efforts, leading to threats and an investigation by the state election board.
Hamrick is associated with People Over Party, a Virginia-based nonprofit that has worked to get West on the ballot in several states, including Arizona and Pennsylvania. Despite his involvement, Hamrick has declined to reveal who is funding the initiative or who else is behind it.
Hamrick’s political history is complex. Though he denies being a Republican, records show he has supported GOP causes in recent years. He has also been involved in controversial political tactics in the past, such as backing “ghost candidates” in Florida to influence election outcomes.
Currently, Hamrick is actively working to place West’s name on ballots in key states, often facing legal challenges from Democrats. Despite these efforts, West did not qualify for the ballot in Arizona.
The broader goal of this campaign appears to be to divert votes from Harris, the Democratic nominee, potentially altering the outcome of the election. While the effort to influence the election through third-party candidates is not new, it is being pursued more aggressively this time around. As the election draws closer, the impact of these strategies remains to be seen.